Deshone Kizer’s name became synonymous with the Cleveland Browns’ quarterback conundrum in 2017, when he took over for an injured Baker Mayfield and delivered a 4-0 start that briefly reignited hope in a franchise mired in decades of failure. That moment—however fleeting—cemented his place in Browns lore and set the stage for one of the most scrutinized contract negotiations in modern NFL history. The Deshone Kizer salary debate wasn’t just about dollars; it was a microcosm of the Browns’ broader struggles to balance roster needs, financial responsibility, and the volatile expectations of a fanbase desperate for relevance.
What followed was a rollercoaster of highs and lows. Kizer’s 2017 season, though statistically impressive (1,603 passing yards, 11 TDs, 4 INTs), was overshadowed by Mayfield’s eventual return and the Browns’ eventual 3-13 collapse. His Deshone Kizer salary became a lightning rod—praised by some as a bargain for a franchise in transition, criticized by others as a wasted investment. The truth, as always, lay in the numbers: a rookie deal that reflected both the Browns’ cautious optimism and the NFL’s brutal reality check for quarterbacks who peak early but rarely sustain it.
Fast-forward to today, and Kizer’s career trajectory—marked by injuries, inconsistent play, and a brief stint with the New York Jets—has left many wondering: *How much is Deshone Kizer actually worth?* The answer isn’t just about his Deshone Kizer salary in 2024, but about the broader narrative of NFL quarterback economics, where rookie contracts are often more about potential than proven value, and where even a standout performance can be undone by a single bad snap or a team’s shifting priorities.
The Deshone Kizer salary story begins with a 2017 rookie contract that, on paper, seemed generous for a quarterback who had never started a game in college. The Browns, flush with cash after years of draft-day trades and cap relief, structured his deal to reward upside while mitigating risk. Kizer’s four-year, $13.25 million contract included a $6.85 million signing bonus—standard for a first-round pick in that era—and a base salary progression that peaked at $3.5 million in 2020. For comparison, Baker Mayfield’s rookie deal (also signed in 2018) was nearly identical in structure, reflecting the Browns’ dual-QB strategy and their belief that both players could contribute in different ways.
Yet the Deshone Kizer salary took on a life of its own as the 2017 season unfolded. His 4-0 start against playoff-caliber teams (including a win over the Steelers) had Browns fans dreaming of a Super Bowl run. The contract, which included a $10 million roster bonus in 2018, became a symbol of the franchise’s willingness to invest in its future. But when Mayfield returned and Kizer’s production dipped, the narrative shifted. By 2019, Kizer was benched in favor of Baker, and his Deshone Kizer salary became a point of contention—especially as the Browns’ front office grappled with how to manage two high-priced QBs in a division where the Steelers and Ravens dominated.
The Browns’ quarterback situation in 2017 was a perfect storm of optimism and overcorrection. After trading away their first-round pick in 2016 (to acquire Myles Garrett), Cleveland used the 2017 No. 2 overall selection on Kizer, a dual-threat QB from Arizona State who had thrown for 3,200 yards and 27 TDs as a senior. The move was controversial—many analysts questioned whether a quarterback with limited experience should be drafted so high—but the Browns’ front office, led by GM John Dorsey, saw potential in Kizer’s mobility and arm talent. His Deshone Kizer salary was designed to reflect that potential, with incentives tied to passing yards and touchdowns, not just wins.
What followed was a classic case of NFL whiplash. Kizer’s 2017 season was statistically solid, but his durability was questionable. He missed time with a shoulder injury in 2018 and struggled with consistency when he returned. By 2019, the Browns had shifted fully to Mayfield, and Kizer’s role was reduced to a backup. His Deshone Kizer salary became a liability as the team sought to restructure his deal, ultimately releasing him before the 2020 season. The $13.25 million contract, spread over four years, had cost the Browns roughly $3.3 million per season—a steep price for a QB who had started just 10 games in his career. The lesson? Even elite rookie deals can unravel when performance doesn’t meet expectations.
The structure of the Deshone Kizer salary contract was typical of NFL rookie deals in the mid-2010s: front-loaded with signing bonuses and guaranteed money, but with escalating base salaries that rewarded longevity. The key mechanisms included:
The contract’s flaw was its lack of a clear path to release. Unlike modern deals with mutual option clauses, Kizer’s contract had no easy exit for either party. This forced the Browns into a difficult choice: restructure the deal (costing cap space) or release Kizer and absorb a dead-cap hit. They chose the latter, a move that reflected the harsh reality of NFL economics: even promising rookies can become financial albatrosses if the stars don’t align.
The Deshone Kizer salary was never just about the money—it was a statement. For the Browns, it signaled a commitment to rebuilding through the air, even if the execution was flawed. For Kizer, it was a rare opportunity for a college QB with limited experience to earn elite money upfront. The contract’s impact rippled through the league, sparking debates about whether teams should overpay for unproven QBs or wait for proven commodities. The Browns’ decision to draft Kizer at No. 2—despite skepticism—also highlighted the growing trend of teams prioritizing quarterback talent over other positions, even at the risk of financial missteps.
Yet the Deshone Kizer salary also exposed the NFL’s brutal reality: contracts are written in ink, but performance is written in pencil. Kizer’s career arc—from hero to afterthought—mirrored the Browns’ own journey from irrelevance to cautious optimism. His earnings, while substantial for a rookie, paled in comparison to what he could have made if he had sustained his early success. The story of his Deshone Kizer salary is ultimately a cautionary tale about the NFL’s high-stakes gamble on quarterback talent.
— "The Browns’ contract with Kizer was a classic example of paying for potential rather than production. It’s a gamble every team takes, but the difference between success and failure often comes down to how well you manage the downside."
— NFL insider, 2018
The Deshone Kizer salary was part of a larger trend in NFL quarterback contracts during the 2010s, where teams were willing to overpay for elite talent—even if it meant taking on risk. Below is a comparison of Kizer’s deal to other notable rookie QB contracts from the same era:
| Player | Team | Rookie Contract (Total) | Key Differences |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deshone Kizer | Cleveland Browns | $13.25M (4 years) | Front-loaded with $6.85M signing bonus; no win guarantees; mobility-focused incentives. |
| Baker Mayfield | Cleveland Browns | $13.25M (4 years) | Identical structure to Kizer’s deal, reflecting Browns’ dual-QB strategy. |
| Josh Allen | Buffalo Bills | $13.25M (4 years) | Similar total value, but Allen’s deal included more pass-rush incentives due to his size and athleticism. |
| Lamar Jackson | Baltimore Ravens | $13.25M (4 years) | Included more rushing-yard bonuses, reflecting Ravens’ belief in his dual-threat potential. |
While Kizer’s Deshone Kizer salary was in line with his peers, his lack of durability and consistency made it a less favorable outcome compared to Allen or Jackson, who went on to franchise QB status. The key takeaway? The NFL’s willingness to invest in quarterback talent is matched only by its impatience when that talent doesn’t pan out.
The Deshone Kizer salary contract was a product of its time—a blend of optimism and risk management that reflected the NFL’s evolving approach to quarterback development. Moving forward, we’re likely to see two major trends shape how rookies like Kizer are compensated:
The Browns’ experience with Kizer also foreshadows a broader shift: teams are becoming more cautious about drafting QBs early, instead opting for later-round picks or free-agent signings with proven track records. The Deshone Kizer salary saga serves as a case study in how quickly NFL fortunes can change—and how contracts, once set in stone, can become liabilities in an instant.
The story of the Deshone Kizer salary is more than just a footnote in NFL contract history—it’s a microcosm of the league’s broader challenges in evaluating quarterback talent. Kizer’s career, while not a success by traditional measures, was a financial win for him personally. The $13.25 million he earned as a rookie provided a safety net during his transition to backup roles, and his time with the Browns gave him the platform to eventually land a short-lived stint with the Jets. For the Browns, however, his Deshone Kizer salary was a costly lesson in the perils of overinvesting in unproven talent.
As the NFL continues to evolve, the Deshone Kizer salary contract remains a cautionary tale about balancing risk and reward. It’s a reminder that in the world of NFL quarterback economics, even the most promising deals can unravel when performance doesn’t meet expectations. For Kizer, the money was a consolation prize—a financial cushion that allowed him to keep playing, even if the glory never came. For the Browns, it was a painful reminder that in the NFL, potential is never enough; results are everything.
A: As of 2024, Deshone Kizer’s total career earnings from his NFL contracts amount to approximately $13.25 million from his rookie deal with the Browns, plus additional earnings from his brief stint with the New York Jets in 2021. His Deshone Kizer salary was fully guaranteed at signing, meaning he kept the entire amount even after being released.
A: No, the Browns did not restructure Kizer’s Deshone Kizer salary. They chose to release him in 2020, absorbing a dead-cap hit of roughly $5 million. This was a strategic move to free up cap space for younger players like Nick Chubb and Baker Mayfield, even though it meant taking a financial loss on Kizer’s contract.
A: Kizer’s Deshone Kizer salary was standard for a first-round QB in 2017, matching the deals of Baker Mayfield (also $13.25M) and Josh Allen ($13.25M). However, his lack of durability and inconsistent play made his contract less valuable compared to peers like Allen, who went on to earn franchise QB money.
A: Yes. If Kizer had maintained his 2017 form—including his 4-0 start and strong statistical output—his Deshone Kizer salary could have been restructured to include win bonuses or extended into a long-term deal worth $50M+ by 2021. Instead, his career arc took a downward turn, limiting his earning potential.
A: After being cut by Cleveland in 2020, Kizer spent the 2020 and 2021 seasons as a backup before signing a short-term deal with the New York Jets in 2021. He earned an estimated $1.5 million in 2021 but did not play in a regular-season game. His Deshone Kizer salary from his rookie contract provided financial stability during this period.
A: While the exact structure of the Deshone Kizer salary is rare today, modern rookie QB contracts still include front-loaded signing bonuses and performance incentives. However, teams now favor shorter-term deals (3 years) with third-year options to avoid overcommitting to unproven talent. Players like Trevor Lawrence and Trey Lance have received similar upfront money but with more flexibility for both player and team.
A: Nothing unusual by NFL standards, but his Deshone Kizer salary did include a large roster bonus ($10M in 2018) that was contingent on him remaining on the active roster for the entire season. This was a high-risk, high-reward clause that reflected the Browns’ belief in his potential. Most modern contracts avoid such large, all-or-nothing bonuses in favor of smaller, incremental incentives.