Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.gzu.ac.zw:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/412
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSunge, Regret-
dc.contributor.authorMakamba, Biatrice Simbisai-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-20T07:46:49Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-20T07:46:49Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-
dc.identifier.issn2453-5966-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.gzu.ac.zw:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/412-
dc.description.abstractValidity of the Quantity Theory of Money (QTM) continues to be heavily contested. The current examination is born out of the realization that there is no evidence for an economy using multiple currencies and deprived of monetary policy sovereignty. Using the Auto-Regressive Distributed-Lag approach to long-run association and co-integration analysis, we document weak evidence for the QTM for the period 01/01/2009-31/03/2018. However post-introduction of bond coins and notes in December 2014, we find sufficient evidence for the QTM. After controlling for other determinants, budget deficit was found to be the major peddler of inflation. We deduce that the multiple currency diluted the central bank’s discretion over monetary policy. We welcome the scraping of the multiple currency system. Nevertheless, to safeguard the abuse of the restored monetary policy sovereignty, we recommend money supply targeting as the primary monetary policy target.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAfrican Journal of Economic Reviewen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol 8;Issue I-
dc.subjectQuantity Theory of Moneyen_US
dc.subjectMultiple Currencyen_US
dc.subjectARDL Bound Testing Co-integrationen_US
dc.titleTesting the Quantity Theory of Money in Zimbabwe under the Multiple Currency Regime: An ARDL Bound Testing Approachen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Staff Articles



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.